Fischer: Short Info: Disease Staging (USA).

Z I M       January 2008


Short Info: Disease Staging (USA)

Wolfram Fischer

Zentrum für Informatik und wirtschaftliche Medizin
CH-9116 Wolfertswil SG (Switzerland)
http://www.fischer-zim.ch/


Kapitel G.1 aus:
The DRG Family
State of affairs: 2007

      
Navigation
 î  ZIM home
 î  navigation tables
 î  sitemap
 î  abbreviations
DRG Family
^ index
<   Alternative Systems (1): Multiple grouping
>   Short Info: PMC (USA)
 
=   [print] [pdf icon] Whole Text as pdf file (1020 KB)
Related Links
»    Kurz-Info: Disease Staging (USA)
External Links
»   Disease Staging
 
 

|^·<×>·v|

G.1

 

Disease Staging

1

 

Table 1:
Hierarchical levels of Disease Staging

Table 1: 
Hierarchical levels of Disease Staging

2

   

Source: Fischer [DRGs im Vergleich, 1999]: 46.

 

1 Gonella et al. [DS-ClinCrit, 1994]; Gonella et al. [Disease Staging, 1984].

 

Physicians as experts

The development of the D.S. system1 began in the late 70s, at about the same time as DRGs (Diagnosis Related Groups). Unlike in the case of DRGs, the D.S. concept is based on a purely medical expert approach, and not upon statistical considerations.

3

 

Diseases

The system describes "diseases". Each disease is considered to run through various "stages". Inspired from the disease staging concept known in oncology, medical consultants have defined stages for 372 clinical conditions. In addition, 224 categories for not specifically defined conditions are present (e. g. "other malignant neoplasms of the circulatory system", "not otherwise specified heart diseases", "unspecified heart diseases" etc.).

4

 

Stage of disease

The disease stage is derived from all the diagnoses that were collected during the hospital stay of a patient. It is related to the mortality risk or the risk of retaining a disability from the disease. The treatment intended is not considered. (This allows for clear distinction between patient problems and therapy characteristics!)

5

   

 

 

   

The stages are as follows:

  • Stage 1: A disease with no complications.
  • Stage 2: The disease has local complications. (The problem is limited to an organ or body system; there is a significantly increased risk of complications.)
  • Stage 3: The disease involves multiple sites, or has systemic complications. (Prognosis is bad.)
  • Stage 4: Death (occurred during the hospital stay).

6

 

Differentiating DRG cost weights

Often, the D.S. system was used to demonstrate inhomogenity of DRGs. This task is facilitated through the D.S. system's software, using a special index: The "DRGSCALE" figure shows, how much the cost weight of an individual hospital stay deviates from the DRG-related average value.

7

   

 

 

 

References

 
 
Fischer
DRGs im Vergleich
1999
Fischer W. Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) im Vergleich zu den Patienten­klassifi­kations­systemen von Deutschland und Österreich. Eine problemzentrierte Diskussion von Patienten­klassifi­kations­systemen für stationäre Akut­behandlungen im Hinblick auf deren Verwendung in Ver­gütungs­systemen. Wolfertswil (ZIM) 1999: 155 pp. Auszüge: http:// www.fischer-zim.ch / studien / DRGs-im-Vergleich-9901-Info.htm.

8

 
Gonella et al.
Disease Staging
1984
Gonella JS, Hornbrook MC, Louis DZ. Staging of Disease. A Case-Mix Measurement. In: JAMA 1984(251)5: 637–644.

9

 
Gonella et al.
DS-ClinCrit
1994
Gonella JS, Louis DZ, Marvin EG. Disease Staging: Clinical Criteria. Fourth Edition, Ann Arbor (MEDSTAT Systems) 1994: 834 pp.

10

Z I M  -  Zentrum für Informatik und wirtschaftliche Medizin
CH-9116 Wolfertswil (SG), Steigstrasse 12, Switzerland
E-mail: , Tel: +41 71 3900 444

 
 
Previous Chapter: Tables of Contents: Next Chapter:
Alternative Systems (1): Multiple grouping DRG Family Short Info: PMC (USA)
Navigations-Tabellen
Z I M - Hauptseite

©  Z I M 
Source = http://www.fischer-zim.ch/textk-pcs-en/t-G1-drg-fam-DS-en-0801.htm
( latest compilation: 17.04.2012 )